India–China Cooperation: A Challenge to Washington’s Indo-Pacific Playbook

When Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi landed in Tianjin this weekend for the Shanghai Cooperation Organisation (SCO) Summit, the significance extended far beyond the agenda of regional security. His meeting with Chinese leadership, amid new U.S. tariffs and growing friction in India–U.S. relations, raises a critical question for global executives: could warming ties between Asia’s two largest economies blunt Washington’s strategy in the Indo-Pacific?

Washington’s Dilemma

For over a decade, the U.S. has positioned India as a counterweight to China in its Indo-Pacific strategy, reinforced by the QUAD grouping (U.S., India, Japan, Australia). The vision was clear: leverage India’s geographic position, naval capacity, and growing economy to balance Beijing’s maritime and economic clout.

Yet, with relations between New Delhi and Washington strained by tariffs and trade disputes, India now appears more willing to engage strategically with China, at least on economic and multilateral platforms. For the United States, this poses a dilemma: if India leans toward cooperation with China, its role as the “balancer” in Washington’s Indo-Pacific strategy could weaken.

Strategic De-escalation or New Alignment?

The India–China thaw is being described by analysts as strategic de-escalation. While both sides continue to contest borders along the Line of Actual Control (LAC) and disagree on projects like the Belt and Road Initiative (BRI), they recognize overlapping interests:

• Bilateral Trade: At over $120 billion annually, China is India’s largest trading partner, though the trade deficit is a politically sensitive $100 billion.
• Multilateral Cooperation: Platforms like BRICS, G20, and SCO offer space for coordination on economic governance, climate change, and South–South collaboration.
• Global South Leadership: Both nations see value in shaping narratives that counterbalance Western-dominated institutions and rules.

For CEOs and investors, this signals potential for greater trade stability, supply chain resilience, and cross-border investment opportunities between Asia’s two largest markets, even if border disputes remain unresolved.

Implications for U.S. Strategy

If India and China deepen cooperation, it will complicate U.S. ambitions in the Indo-Pacific and beyond. Several scenarios are worth noting for C-Suite leaders:

• Diluted Sanctions Impact
  U.S. efforts to constrain Russia’s “war economy” through sanctions rely heavily on Asian compliance. A coordinated China–India stance could create alternative financing and trading systems, limiting Western leverage.
• Reduced Defense Cooperation
  India’s discontent with U.S. tariffs could spill over into less enthusiasm for defense and maritime collaboration, blunting QUAD’s military edge.
• Hedging by Emerging Economies
  ASEAN, Middle Eastern, and African nations may emulate India’s strategy, hedging between Washington and Beijing to maximize economic and security benefits. This multipolarity could weaken the U.S. narrative of a “rules-based order.”

Business and Investment Dimensions

For global executives, the rapprochement carries direct economic consequences:

• Supply Chains: A less confrontational India–China relationship may open opportunities for joint ventures, smoother logistics, and less risk of cross-border disruption. For manufacturing multinationals, this could stabilize regional operations.
• Capital Flows: Increased trade ties could boost capital markets in both countries. Private equity and investment banks may find new deal flow in technology, consumer goods, and infrastructure sectors that straddle both markets.
• Technology and Digital: Despite past restrictions on Chinese apps and investment in India, warming ties could reopen selective doors for cross-border technology partnerships.
• Energy and Commodities: Both economies are energy-intensive importers. Coordination could strengthen their bargaining power in oil, gas, and renewables, affecting global pricing dynamics.

Risks to Watch

Executives should also remain cautious:

• Border Disputes: Historical friction over Aksai Chin and Arunachal Pradesh remains unresolved. Any military flare-up could reverse progress overnight.
• Political Constraints: Domestic politics in India may limit the depth of cooperation, particularly given anti-China sentiment after past clashes.
• U.S. Countermoves: Washington may respond with deeper incentives for India, including investment or defense partnerships, to limit Beijing’s influence.

Thus, while de-escalation is real, a full alliance between India and China remains unlikely. Instead, what emerges may be a pragmatic economic partnership layered atop persistent geopolitical mistrust.

Executive Takeaway

For CEOs, CFOs, private equity executives, and HNWIs, the message is clear:

• Expect greater multipolarity. The Indo-Pacific will not simply be Washington vs. Beijing—India is recalibrating, and so will others.
• Opportunities will surface in trade, investment, and joint infrastructure projects, particularly through multilateral forums like BRICS and SCO.
• Risk management remains critical. The border disputes and U.S. countermoves ensure volatility is not going away.

In short, the Xi–Modi rapprochement is not about replacing rivalry with friendship; it is about creating space for economic cooperation in an era where global business leaders must operate across competing geopolitical narratives.

Have you read?
The World’s Best Medical Schools.
The World’s Best Universities.
The World’s Best International High Schools.
The World’s Best Business Schools.
The World’s Best Fashion Schools.
The World’s Best Hospitality And Hotel Management Schools.